[Lame-dev] New lame upstream release?
Andres Mejia
mcitadel at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 15:08:58 UTC 2011
On Jul 26, 2011 10:24 AM, "Rogério Brito" <rbrito at ime.usp.br> wrote:
>
> Hi, Andres.
>
> On Jul 26 2011, Andres Mejia wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Andres Mejia <mcitadel at gmail.com>
wrote:
> > x264 which was in a similar situation as lame was just accepted into
Debian.
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2011/07/msg02178.html
>
> Did you receive my email from a few minutes ago regarding the patch?
>
> > We're just waiting for a new release of lame with all the license
> > clarification changes before uploading lame to Debian. :-)
>
> I don't think that we will be able to release anything in time for
DebConf,
> as LAME is just beginning to get into the beta stage.
>
> My advice would be to just grab the latest stable release, backport
whatever
> patches would be useful and just upload that to the archive.
>
> BTW, if you have other patches, please don't forget to forward them to me.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFCAAAA
> http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de
> DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br
Ok thanks. I'll get to this tonight.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20110726/cbadac94/attachment.html>
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list