[Lame-dev] New lame upstream release?

[Andres Mejia]

On Jul 26, 2011 12:49 PM, "robert" <Robert.Hegemann at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Rogério.
>
> Am 26.07.2011, 16:24 Uhr, schrieb Rogério Brito <rbrito at ime.usp.br>:
>
>
>>> We're just waiting for a new release of lame with all the license
>>> clarification changes before uploading lame to Debian. :-)
>>
>>
>> I don't think that we will be able to release anything in time for
DebConf,
>> as LAME is just beginning to get into the beta stage.
>
>
> What time frame are we talking about?
>
> From my point of view, there may be some small patches to apply
> and then release 3.99:
>
> 1 - pending LGPL patch
> 2 - eventually changing default behaviour for ID3v2 unicode tags.
>
> What do the others think?
>
>
>
> Ciao Robert

I was simply going to backport the lgpl patches and upload the last release.
I suppose there's no need to wait for a new release now.
On Jul 26, 2011 12:49 PM, "robert" <Robert.Hegemann at gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Rogério.
>
> Am 26.07.2011, 16:24 Uhr, schrieb Rogério Brito <rbrito at ime.usp.br>:
>
>>> We're just waiting for a new release of lame with all the license
>>> clarification changes before uploading lame to Debian. :-)
>>
>> I don't think that we will be able to release anything in time for
>> DebConf,
>> as LAME is just beginning to get into the beta stage.
>
> What time frame are we talking about?
>
> From my point of view, there may be some small patches to apply
> and then release 3.99:
>
> 1 - pending LGPL patch
> 2 - eventually changing default behaviour for ID3v2 unicode tags.
>
> What do the others think?
>
>
>
> Ciao Robert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20110726/221c5746/attachment.html>