request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2011-10-03 09:19, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> 
> This is probably not the right place to ask, but why is puredata
> packaged in a different team than all the pd-libraries? 

mainly because of legacy reasons.
the current maintainer (paul), has not shown any inclination on moving
the "puredata" package to pkg-multimedia.

i think this should be respected.

> This is a bit of an unlucky situation.

why?
if the only reason is to not have to include paul's address in such
discussions, then i think it is a rather lame excuse.

(apart from that, it is mainly me who is responsible for the changes in
question, and you do reach me via this group.)

fmgasdr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk6JY74ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvRPmgCdFIGsmRC8nepWrtj5nmxxUsbx
bEMAnRuKVC42fKxaI1kKOGMkF64nqWFL
=3U/R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20111003/3d340a82/attachment.bin>