Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]

[Felipe Sateler]

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:32, Reinhard Tartler <siretart at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Felipe Sateler <fsateler at debian.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:15, Felipe Sateler <fsateler at debian.org> wrote:
>>> I've been reviewing the Bits, and have a comment:
>>>
>>> The lash->ladish change is confusing. The part about a patch being
>>> needed is unnecessary IMO. It should be replaced by a statement of
>>> wether jackd1 and jackd2 support ladish (do they? I'd change it myself
>>> but I don't know if both do).
>>>
>>>
>>> I'll edit this thing a bit now (mostly cosmetic changes).
>>
>> BTW, given the current discussion on debian-devel (where people stated
>> they still use d-m.o for codecs), we should send the message ASAP.
>
> I have added some additional bits regarding Libav/FFmpeg there.
>
> Who has time to finalize and send it out?

We are still missing an explanation on the following sentence:

Note that JACK needs to compile with a no-self-connect patch enabled
in order to prevent clients self-connect/disconnect their own ports to
ports of other JACK applications. The current jackd2 version available
in Debian Wheezy fully supports ladish and also cooperates fine with
it.

What does this mean for jackd1? If it is enabled, is this worth mentioning?


-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler