Bug#674311: libffado: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/debian/tmp/usr/bin/ffado-dbus-server': No such file or directory

[Vincent Cheng]

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Adrian Knoth
<adi at drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> wrote:
> On 05/24/2012 11:49 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Hi, especially Vince from dbus-c++!
>
>> Source: libffado
>> Version: 2.0.99+svn2124-1
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: wheezy sid
>> User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
>> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120524 qa-ftbfs
>> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
>> amd64.
>
>
>>> Checking whether 'which dbusxx-xml2cpp' executes no
>>>
>>> One of the dbus-headers, the dbus-c++-headers and/or the application
>>> 'dbusxx-xml2cpp' where not found. The dbus-server for ffado will
>>> therefore not be built.
>
>
> Formerly, dbusxx-xml2cpp has been provided in libdbus-c++-dev, but as of
> dbus-c++-0.9.0-3, it's been split into a separate libdbus-c++-bin
> package for the sake of multiarch.
>
> I can now add libdbus-c++-bin to the list of build dependencies in
> libffado, however, maybe it makes sense to have libdbus-c++-dev depend
> on libdbus-c++-bin for backwards compatibility and due to their close
> relation.
>
> WDYT?

Hi Adrian,

Agreed, I'll upload a fixed version of dbus-c++ ASAP. I admit that I
neglected to run test re-builds of dbus-c++'s reverse dependencies
right after converting it to multiarch, sorry!

I'd still encourage you to add libdbus-c++-bin as a build dependency
for libffado though; sflphone [1] (AFAIK the only other package that
build depends on dbus-c++) has also done so.

Regards,
Vincent

[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sflphone/news/20120520T031623Z.html