git-packaging workflows
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Mon Apr 8 10:07:41 UTC 2013
Quoting Felipe Sateler (2013-04-08 06:56:51)
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
> > Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2013-04-06 09:32:04)
> >> Recently, Russ' blog post was echoed on http://planet.debian.org:
> >>
> >> http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/journal/2013-04/001.html
> >>
> >> In that post, he describes how to combine both the "import tarball"
> >> and the "have upstream history" available in the upstream packaging
> >> branch. AFAIUI, the heavy work is implemented in git-buildpackage's
> >> --upstream-vcs-tag <tag> option.
> >>
> >> While that option is news to me, I wonder if maybe anyone else
> >> already experiments with this? Does the team feel that making it
> >> mandatory for our package would be beneficial and appropriate?
> >
> > I have (way more complex) practiced that for a few years for Sugar
> > packages. Now that it has become dead simply to do with
> > git-buildpackage I wholeheartedly welcome mandating it - but only
> > for those of our upstreams that themselves use git, obviously.
>
> I suppose fixing the history would be too time consuming? So the
> history would remain as imported tarballs?
Not sure what you mean, Felipe.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list