pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Jaromír Mikeš]

2013/8/28 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher at debian.org>

> On 2013-08-28 00:25:29, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >
> > The attached patch definitely did it for me. Well, except for the test
> > failure of course.
>
> ... and for the test failure maybe the attached patch is enough.
>

Looks fine to me , but I am not python guru at all :(
Actually I am maintaining this package only because it is dependency for my
other packages klick gtklick.

Should something else to be done?

thank you

mira
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20130828/8bbc2a65/attachment.html>