priorority 'optional' vs 'extra'
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Dec 16 08:55:17 UTC 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2013-12-16 00:01, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2013/12/11 IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
>
>>
>> i thus propose to do a cleanup of the package priorities and move
>> as many packages to "optional" as possible.
>>
>>
> I have switched these packages to "priority optional" and upload
> some time ago but now when I am checking they are still "extra":
> clthreads clxclient rubberband vamp-plugin-sdk
>
>
> Something more should be done than just uploading?
afaik, we have to file a bug-report with ftp.d.o to manually switch
the priority.
i'd volunteer to do that for all packages involved (or only those,
where the DMs consent to switch the priority).
that's why i wanted to start this discussion.
fgnasdr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/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=0rV/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list