Fwd: [SCM] ffdiaporama/master: Update for ffdiaporama 1.5 - Added b-d on libqimageblitz-dev - Replace dependency on ffmpeg by libav-tools - Added dependency on libavcodec-extra
Fabrice Coutadeur
coutadeurf at gmail.com
Fri Feb 1 05:21:35 UTC 2013
Sorry, forgot to send the answer to the list
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Fabrice Coutadeur <coutadeurf at gmail.com>
Date: 2013/2/1
Subject: Re: [SCM] ffdiaporama/master: Update for ffdiaporama 1.5 - Added
b-d on libqimageblitz-dev - Replace dependency on ffmpeg by libav-tools -
Added dependency on libavcodec-extra
To: Reinhard Tartler <siretart at gmail.com>
Hi,
I remember the package failing to run without the -extra variant. I'll
build a version without it, and paste here the error, if this is still the
case.
Fabrice
2013/1/31 Reinhard Tartler <siretart at gmail.com>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:27 AM,
> <fabricesp-guest at users.alioth.debian.org> wrote:
> > The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> > commit a9015bc4729c1b88fc7eb8264091f00a5cedd0bc
> > Author: Fabrice Coutadeur <coutadeurf at gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon Nov 26 19:49:02 2012 +0100
> >
> > Update for ffdiaporama 1.5
> > - Added b-d on libqimageblitz-dev
> > - Replace dependency on ffmpeg by libav-tools
> > - Added dependency on libavcodec-extra
> >
> > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> > index d4f2087..c813223 100644
> > --- a/debian/control
> > +++ b/debian/control
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Build-Depends:
> > libavutil-dev,
> > libexiv2-dev,
> > libqt4-dev,
> > + libqimageblitz-dev,
> > libsdl-image1.2-dev,
> > libsdl-mixer1.2-dev,
> > libswscale-dev,
> > @@ -25,7 +26,8 @@ Package: ffdiaporama
> > Architecture: any
> > Depends:
> > ffdiaporama-data,
> > - ffmpeg,
> > + libav-tools,
> > + libavcodec-extra-53 | libavcodec-extra-54,
>
> Sorry for chiming in that late, but I'm not sure if I agree with this last
> line.
>
> Why does ffdiaporama so badly require the -extra- variant? In any
> case, this alternative is wrong, as in the installed system, one of
> these two will definitely not be useful for the package.
>
> I think the best way to fix this would be to introduce a meta package
> that ensures that the -extra- variant is available. However, before
> doing so, I want to learn about the use case in more detail before.
>
> --
> regards,
> Reinhard
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20130201/a1085b3e/attachment.html>
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list