Bug#694657: closed by Reinhard Tartler <siretart at tauware.de> (Bug#694657: fixed in libav 6:9.1-1)
siretart at gmail.com
Thu Jan 10 08:55:12 UTC 2013
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Francesco Poli
<invernomuto at paranoici.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:11:38 +0100 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Francesco Poli
>> > Which license is the libavcodec-extra-* package released under?
>> > LGPL-2.1+ or GPL-2+ ?
> GPL-3+ is the effective license of the binary package.
> My question was "which is the license for the source files which are
> compiled in order to generate that binary package?".
Oh I'm sorry, I mixed that up. There is no clear answer on that
because it depends. Most of the files are LGPL, but some hand-written
assembler optimizations are GPL-2+. The configure script offers an
--enable-gpl switch that includes those GPL-2+ sources. We do enable
this switch for all packages we produce in Debian.
In theory, we could probably also provide an LGPL build of libavcodec.
Fortunately, nobody has requested that so far.
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers