Bug#694657: closed by Reinhard Tartler <siretart at tauware.de> (Bug#694657: fixed in libav 6:9.1-1)

[Fabian Greffrath]

Am 14.01.2013 12:07, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> I agree that debian/copyright is the best place to cover effective
> licensing, but I disagree that we whould do it before it is defined as
> the purpose of that file to cover *both* source and effective licensing.

But then, TTBOMK the effective license of a library does not only 
depend on the licenses of the source files it is composed of. For 
example, using a LGPL-2+ licensed library in software that is 
Apache-licensed will turn the effective license of said library to 
LGPL-3, because LGPL-2 is incompatible. However, I am afraid these are 
some corner cases that we simply cannot cover in debian/copyright.

  - Fabian