Bug#701257: Could you provide more info, please

[Sebastian Ramacher]

Control: tags -1 + upstream fixed-upstream

On 2013-06-03 02:22:14, David García Garzón wrote:
> Al 03/06/13 01:50, En/na Sebastian Ramacher ha escrit:
> > Hi David
> >
> > On 2013-03-11 16:37:40, David García Garzón wrote:
> >> I am one of the developers of the CLAM framework trying to reproduce the
> >> bug in Ubuntu (gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.2-2ubuntu1) 4.7.2) with no luck.
> >>
> >> My guess is that some system headers (in Debian and Gentoo but not in
> >> Ubuntu) define TIME_UTC as preprocessor macro. If someone being able to
> >> reproduce the bug could confirm this point (by inserting #ifdef TIME_UTC
> >> #error) and locating the header we could move forward.
> > Thanks for investigating this issue.
> >
> > Starting with eglibc 2.17 TIME_UTC is defined in time.h. Ubuntu should
> > have a version defining TIME_UTC since raring.
> >
> > Please let me know if I can help you track it down further.
> >
> > Regards
> 
> Well, the bug should be already fixed upstream. We changed the name of
> the macro.

Cool. Could you point me to the revision that renamed the macro?

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20130603/2eede0a5/attachment.pgp>