[SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

[Reinhard Tartler]

Yes it does.
Am 15.06.2013 00:44 schrieb "Felipe Sateler" <fsateler at debian.org>:

> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Reinhard Tartler <siretart at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Felipe Sateler <fsateler at debian.org>
> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Reinhard Tartler <siretart at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Felipe Sateler <fsateler at debian.org>
> wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:36 PM,  <mira-guest at users.alioth.debian.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> >>>>> commit 27b3130d6ea719a3470c2d9a8f552657cb3d72c5
> >>>>> Author: Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at seznam.cz>
> >>>>> Date:   Fri Jun 14 00:45:12 2013 +0200
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     Dont sign tags
> >>>>
> >>>> Why did you do this? Tags are better signed
> >>>
> >>> For folks like me, who do not have their GPG keys on the development
> >>> machines, having this in the configuration is just annoying.
> >>>
> >>> please set this to your ~/.gbp.conf instead if you want this behavior,
> >>> but please do not force this policy to others.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your understanding.
> >>
> >> And how do you upload if you don't have the GPG key?
> >
> > I usually ssh to some other machine, where I work on the package. When
> > I'm happy with it, I "debsign -r $host:$pathtochanges" and can then
> > continue to dput the package.
>
> OK thanks for the explanation. If it causes trouble, then lets not
> sign them. Does gbp generate annotated tags?
>
>
> --
>
> Saludos,
> Felipe Sateler
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20130615/7dfc2b05/attachment.html>