[SCM] ardour3/master: Droped obsolete patches.

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Quoting Jaromír Mikeš (2013-09-08 08:00:03)
> 2013/9/7 Adrian Knoth <[1]adi at drcomp.erfurt.thur.de>
>> One issue per commit, please. That means: removing/dropping each 
>> patch individually.
>> The waf.patch isn't obsolete, since we're stripping the waf binary 
>> from upstream. Consequently, we have to replace it with waf-light.
>
> Ops sorry ... waf.patch shouldn't be removed but renamed to 0001-waf.patch
> ... I didn't push new file :(

Better IMO to avoid renaming, to ease locating patches by reading 
changelog.

Here are some advices about patch naming/numbering:

  * Use the patch naming micro policy, and include its README.
  * When adding a patch, mention its number and purpose in changelog.
  * When dropping a patch, mention at least its number.
  * If renumbering (if you really must), mention old and new number.
  * Mention numbers explicitly (not e.g. ranges) to ease grep'ing.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20130908/4fefecd8/attachment.sig>