Ardour3 architecture list

Jaromír Mikeš mira.mikes at gmail.com
Fri Jul 11 01:52:25 UTC 2014


2014-07-10 17:12 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler <fsateler at debian.org>:

>
> Ardour3 takes a long time to build. The mips and mipsel buildds killed
> the build after 150 and 300 minutes of inactivity. I managed to build
> ardour3 in the mipsel porterbox, so I don't think ardour has any real
> problem on mipsel. I was wondering if maybe we should restrict ardour
> to the architectures it is likely to be used. Otherwise we might need
> to ask that ardour be retried until it manages to print output fast
> enough to avoid getting killed.
>
> What do you think?
>

Do we have any chance to find out how many times ardour3 has been installed
on mips/mipsel?
To me these architectures seems to be quite exotic.

By my personal opinion we could skip them and reintroduce them when if
there will be user's interest or
if situation with mips/mipsel "build servers" get improved.

We should probably also document it somewhere debian/changelog ?
debian.README?

mira
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20140711/24f36238/attachment.html>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list