libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Joachim Bauch]

Hi Thorsten,

thanks for the detailed feedback, please see my comments below.

On 30.07.2014 16:05, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> ok, so I would suggest to change the header of those application files
> from "This file is part of libde265." to something like "This file is
> part of a sample application to show the usage of libde265:"

Ok, this has been changed.

>> How should the license information be reworked? Is it sufficient to
>> update the Readme.md to state that the library is LGPLv3 but the sample
>> apps are GPLv3?
> 
> Yes, that would be ok. The icing on the cake would be if you add this as
> comment to debian/copyright as well.

The Readme.md has been updated and a comment added to debian/copyright.

> No, that information should be part of the source tarball that everybody
> can download.

I understand. We created a new release that contains all your feedback.

@Alessio: could you (or any other uploader) please review my changes
and create/upload a new package of "libde265"?

I updated the git repository on alioth with these changes:
- Fixed "debian/watch" to download release tarball, not source tarball.
- Updated libde265 to latest upstream version 0.8
- Added "libswscale-dev" as build dependency so sherlock265 example
  will be compiled.
- Reduced amount of exported symbols and updated .symbols file.
- Added comment about only the samples being GPL to "debian/copyright".

Thanks in advance and best regards,
  Joachim