Cleaning up the team's packages?

[Jaromír Mikeš]

2014-04-28 21:39 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at gmail.com>:

>
>
>
> 2014-04-28 18:30 GMT+02:00 Reinhard Tartler <siretart at gmail.com>:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I guess we have to wait for upstream fix now?
>> >
>>
>> I guess upstream would appreciate a patch that fixes this issue, so no
>> need to wait.
>>
>> BTW, I find suggesting dlopen() a pretty slippery slope, not everyone
>> agrees that using dlopen() avoids the OpenSSL/GPL incompatibility.
>> Further options would include to a) disable the functionality that
>> uses openssl (may not work if it is essential for regular operation or
>> b) port to something else like nettle or gnutls.
>>
>> a) might be the least amount of work.
>>
>
> You are definitely right, but such a patch is unfortunately  behind  my
> skills :(
>
>
Upstream is aware of this issue and hopefully it will be fixed in future.

https://github.com/jwm-art-net/Petri-Foo/issues/22

Uploading current petri-foo package would allow me to remove specimen and
phat package.

Is issue with openssl complete stopper for uploading?

regards

mira
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20140610/ddb2a624/attachment.html>