Packaging ardour 4.0

["IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2015-04-20 11:30, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On 04/19/15 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> 
>> Last not least, we should probably cut down on the number of
>> ardour versions in Debian. Nobody supports a2 anymore, same for
>> a3. It's a
> 
> Would it make sense to exclude a2 from Jessie? Removal request?
> 
> I wonder if it's possible to reintroduce a package without the
> epoch field by removing it first everywhere. Assuming it is not
> installed in jessie, one wouldn't need to worry about version
> comparison later.

dunno, though i think "everywhere" would probably include oldstable,
which means that we are talking about a rather longish time frame.

otoh, i'm all for dropping ardour2 asap.

> Or am I too concerned about the epoch number?

i guess so.
epochs are not inherently evil (though admittedly mildly annoying).

mfgasdr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=myAo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----