Bug#794817: Should mplayer2 be removed from unstable?

Sebastian Ramacher sramacher at debian.org
Fri Aug 7 01:19:29 UTC 2015


On 2015-08-06 23:05:58, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Package: mplayer2
> Severity: serious
> 
> I think mplayer2 should be removed because:
>  * It is dead upstream (even the homepage is gone).
>  * mplayer is back in Debian, which can replace mplayer2.

… and one copy of mplayer is surely enough. Alessio, Jonas, Reinhard: What is
your opinion on that?

> Unless someone objects, I'll reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org for
> removal soon.

Before doing so, please file bugs against packages (Build-)Depending on
mplayer2 to switch back to mplayer:

Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
jajuk: jajuk
kphotoalbum: kphotoalbum

# Broken Build-Depends:
jajuk: mplayer2

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20150807/c20ea663/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list