Question for future Debian builds

[Giada LoopMachine]

--- Re-sending message due to missing CC (I always forget it!) ---

Hey guys,

Sorry for the delay! I perfectly understand your pain with JUCE and it's
(non)packaging status. Actually we are considering shipping "raw" JUCE's
source code, with no pre-compiled or embedded libraries around. That way
JUCE would be just a part of the whole source tarball, #include'd and
compiled by Giada itself when needed. What do you say?

Regards,


On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:12 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <
umlaeute at debian.org> wrote:

> On 12/07/2015 09:07 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > I personally would prefer to have JUCE in debian separately rather
> > than embedded library,
>
> +1
>
> > but I am afraid that I am busy too much at the
> > moment to work on it myself.
>
> +1
>
>
> i think last time i checked, JUCE was an *awful mess* (from a packager's
> view).
> that was a couple of years ago, but rumour has it that things have not
> improved.
>
> fgmsadr
> IOhannes
>



-- 
Giovanni A. Zuliani
giadaloopmachine at gmail.com
www.giadamusic.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20151220/2b507329/attachment.html>