musescore_2.0.1+dfsg-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Fabian Greffrath]

Am Dienstag, den 07.07.2015, 16:39 -0400 schrieb Tiago Bortoletto Vaz:
> But, it seems there's a mistery somewhere, musescore package doesn't
> depend on any soundfont. Please help:

Now I am puzzled. This would mean that both the OP and I have checked
the wrong package, i.e. the one in testing and not in unstable. :/

> .o0(maybe the fact that one of the binaries (musescore-soundfont-gm)
> depends on a non-existent package (timgm6mb-soundfont still in NEW)
> makes other binaries from the given source be locked in sid...?)

Yes, this appears to be one reason. The other one is clearly #789481.

Cheers,

Fabian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20150708/54b535dc/attachment.sig>