multimedia-blends: policy question(s)

[Ross Gammon]

On 06/12/2015 03:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> Non-soundsynth packages like gem should of course not be in the
>>> >> soundsynth package, maybe we need a videosynth package?
>>> >>
>> >
>> > i would have put it into the "video" task, but now i see that this is
>> > full with video *players* (and the occasional vjing and converter tool).
>> >
>> > so actually i would split "video" in multiple packages ("videoplayers",
>> > "videosynth", "vjing",...) and have the original video package
>> > Depends/Recommends these.
> Good idea.
> 
> 
>>>> >>> - ffmulticonverter
>>> >> Quite possibly you need to transcode your resulting audio for distribution?
>> >but that's not a "recording" task, it's "postproduction" (which comes
>> >after the *mixing* task).
> Indeed. Feel free to correct things. As I said when I almost dropped
> the tasks and Ross has said now again, the current categorizations are
> not really ok. I unfortunately am out of time to invest much effort
> into this.
> 

Generating new tasks is not something I have played with yet, and will
probably involve some work to rebuild the web sentinel pages. I need to
do some reading.

I will try and put some suggested restructuring up on the wiki based on
this thread and previous ones. It would be best to be sure before we
make the step.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20150613/cafe32c8/attachment.sig>