[SCM] eq10q packaging annotated tag, debian/2.0+beta7.1+repack0-1, created. debian/2.0+beta7.1+repack0-1

Jaromír Mikeš mira.mikes at gmail.com
Mon Mar 23 16:58:08 UTC 2015


2015-03-23 17:28 GMT+01:00 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher at debian.org>:

> On 2015-03-23 17:20:38, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > 2015-03-23 16:31 GMT+01:00 Matteo F. Vescovi <mfv at debian.org>:
> >
> > Hi Matteo,
> >
> > On 2015-03-23 at 16:19 (CET), mira-guest at users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
> > > > The annotated tag, debian/2.0+beta7.1+repack0-1 has been created
> > > >         at  f88ca4244069e483a858b62d8313db0456a72a5a (tag)
> > > >    tagging  6702c59935cf4e23b16e7fbbde4c9eb30159fe46 (commit)
> > > >   replaces  debian/2.0+beta5.1+repack0-2
> > > >  tagged by  Jaromír Mikeš
> > > >         on  Mon Mar 23 16:19:42 2015 +0100
> > > >
> > > > - Shortlog
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Debian release debian/2.0+beta7.1+repack0-1
> > >
> > > Why did you tag with "2.0+beta7.1~repack0-1" while the version is
> > > "2.0~beta7.1~repack0-1"?
> > >
> >
> > If I recall right "~" is for some reason problematic that's why is
> replaced
> > for tagging by "+" or "_".
> > I don't know technical reason.
> > Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> See git-check-ref-format(1) for the technical reason:
>
>  4. They cannot have ASCII control characters (i.e. bytes whose values are
> lower
>     than \040, or \177 DEL), space, tilde ~, caret ^, or colon : anywhere.
>
> git-buildpackage usually replaces ~ with _, but my memory might be wrong.
>

Interesting.

BTW this difference between tags names and changelog entry makes git-dch
--auto not working (for packages with ~ in names) as git-dch cannot find
right tag :(

regards

mira
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20150323/b8054b3c/attachment.html>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list