Select provider of libav* libraries

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Mon May 18 14:45:31 UTC 2015


Quoting Alessandro Ghedini (2015-05-18 14:33:18)
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:15:04AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> There are multiple ways to handle packages unsuitable for long-term 
>> maintenance:
>> 
>>   * Treat as "experimental" - e.g. mpv
>
> How is mpv unsuitable for long-term maintainance?

Oh, I simply assumed that was the case, but since we have an expert on 
the matter (yourself) let's ask:

Why are some mpv packages targeted experimental rather than unstable, if 
not because those specific releases are treated (by you) as unsuitable 
for long-term maintenance?


>>   * Have security team treat as "too unreliable" - e.g. iceweasel
>
> We do provide security support for iceweasel. Where did you get the 
> idea that we don't?
>
> We don't backport fixes but just provide the latest stable release.

Oh, you are right: Indeed iceweasel is not flagged as unsupported.

I got warnings about libmozjs* and wrongly assumed it was used by 
iceweasel itself as well.  Apparently Iceweasel gets off the hook by 
staticly linking libmoxjs (and xulrunner, but that has other more 
complex reasons, I believe).

A proper example is netsurf-gtk (the one causing my confusion).


> The situation with ffmpeg is completely different though, because 
> ffmpeg upstream actually documents which patches fix what security 
> issue: http://ffmpeg.org/security.html
>
> Something that libav upstream doesn't do.

I am describing ways to handle packages unsuitable for long-term support 
here - not throwing mud between FFmpeg and Libav.  You remarks above 
seem unrelated to this subtopic of mine.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20150518/58d4bace/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list