multiple uploaders

[IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)]

hmm, nobody ever answered to this email.

mira's recent mail regarding a 2nd uploader of qxgedit reminded me of
that, and i would like to re-ask:

How much do we want to enforce our ">=2 uploaders per package" rule?

If a package does not have a 2nd uploader (any longer), should it be
removed from the team (e.g. after some grace period)?

If I (intend to) maintain a package that I think fits well under the
pkg-multimedia umbrella (in my case, e.g. a puredata related package)
but do not find a co-uploader immediately (e.g. see my recent
pd-iemtab ITP), should I go solo instead?


mfgasdr
IOhannes


On 2014-11-08 14:53, "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" wrote:
> due to a few recent mails [1], i was wondering how much we (would
> like to) enforce our ">2 uploaders per package" rule.
> 
> i know of at least one package i maintain under the hood of 
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers, which has only a single uploader (me, 
> obviously).
> 
> soundscaperenderer
> 
> 
> is anybody interested in co-maintaining it (uses CDBS)? or should i
> remove this package from the team?
> 
> 
> mgfsadr IOhannes
> 
> 
> [1] at least 
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2014-November/041903.html;
>
> 
but i seem to remember another similar email as well.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list 
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org 
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20150526/267bc65a/attachment.sig>