Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig at umlaeute.mur.at
Fri Sep 11 19:48:23 UTC 2015

On 09/11/2015 09:14 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> What about renaming man pages from ardour4.1 to ardour.1 ? also entry
> in ardour.manpages file
> Same for ardour4.xpm -> ardour.xpm and entry in menu file

but is there any harm in having them called "ardour4"?

> Now when we will have just one ardour it should be fine.

maybe i missed that: but what was the plan for fading out ardour3?

ah yes, adrian wrote:
> drop ardour3 after jessie+1

which means that ardour3 will be hanging around for some time.
maybe we should just setup some alternatives for "ardour" (pointing to
both "ardour3" and "ardour4" with the latter having the higher priority).

or just ignore it.

in any case, i see little reason to *remove* the "ardour4" binary:
people might have scripts that explicitely refer to a versioned ardour.

> There are also ardour4 entry in desktop file ... are they correct?

dunno, they look fine to me;
do you have anything specific in mind.

> I think also some arch64 conditional optimization would be great.
> Something like this in rules file:
> ifneq (,$(findstring :$(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU):,:amd64:))
> CXXFLAGS+=-msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse
> endif

i'd suggest we do this *after* the new packages have been uploaded.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20150911/ffa1565e/attachment.sig>

More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list