Packaging ardour 4.0

[IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)]

On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> 
> So here's the suggestion. Instead of
> 
>    ardour  -> a2
>    ardour3 -> a3
>    ardour4 -> a4
> 
> I propose
> 
>    ardour  -> a4
>    ardour3 -> a3 (legacy tree for jessie)
>    drop ardour3 after jessie+1 (what's the new codename? ;) )
> 

now that both ardour (4.2) and ardour3 (back to 3.5.403) are uploaded to
unstable, i wonder about that last line:
shouldn't we drop ardour3 asap? right now?

probably adding another transitional package (for stretch).

i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a crasher bug
(#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i think that should be
raised to "important").


ghmsdf
IOhannes