Packaging ardour 4.0

[Jaromír Mikeš]

2015-09-16 12:38 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at gmail.com>:
> 2015-09-16 11:32 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
> <umlaeute at debian.org>:
>> On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>>>
>>> So here's the suggestion. Instead of
>>>
>>>    ardour  -> a2
>>>    ardour3 -> a3
>>>    ardour4 -> a4
>>>
>>> I propose
>>>
>>>    ardour  -> a4
>>>    ardour3 -> a3 (legacy tree for jessie)
>>>    drop ardour3 after jessie+1 (what's the new codename? ;) )
>>>
>>
>> now that both ardour (4.2) and ardour3 (back to 3.5.403) are uploaded to
>> unstable, i wonder about that last line:
>> shouldn't we drop ardour3 asap? right now?
>>
>> probably adding another transitional package (for stretch).
>>
>> i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a crasher bug
>> (#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i think that should be
>> raised to "important").
>
> I would remove it.

What should we do with these bugs?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=ardour

They are not appropriate probably anymore as we moved ardour4 to ardour package.
Should we just close them?

best

mira