linuxsampler?

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

On 09/29/2015 05:05 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Felipe Sateler <fsateler at debian.org> wrote:
>>> i'm aware of the exception, but thought that non-free might be ok.
> [snip]
>> This FAQ suggests to me that the clause is just void, but the wording
>> is not very clear.
> 
> This has already been debated in debian-legal [1], and another
> possible interpretation follows:
> 
>  > That is indeed non-free and fails DFSG #6, the package cannot be in main, but
>  > could be in non-free maybe.
> 
>   Probably not, according to some interpretations (the GPL does not allow
>   adding restrictions. The author can distribute the work, since he/she is the
>   author, but noone else can distribute a work licensed in this way).
> 
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00331.html
> 

doh, thanks.
i missed your mail before sending to debian-legal...

gfmadsr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20150929/88efc7d4/attachment.sig>