IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at umlaeute.mur.at
Tue Sep 29 15:16:21 UTC 2015
On 09/29/2015 05:05 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Felipe Sateler <fsateler at debian.org> wrote:
>>> i'm aware of the exception, but thought that non-free might be ok.
>> This FAQ suggests to me that the clause is just void, but the wording
>> is not very clear.
> This has already been debated in debian-legal , and another
> possible interpretation follows:
> > That is indeed non-free and fails DFSG #6, the package cannot be in main, but
> > could be in non-free maybe.
> Probably not, according to some interpretations (the GPL does not allow
> adding restrictions. The author can distribute the work, since he/she is the
> author, but noone else can distribute a work licensed in this way).
>  https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00331.html
i missed your mail before sending to debian-legal...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers