RFS: audacious/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1 and audacious-plugins/3.6.2-2~bpo8+1

[Nicholas D Steeves]

Hi Mattia,

On 28 April 2016 at 06:19, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia at debian.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:26:28PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>> I'm a member of the team, and I'd like to maintain backports of these
>> packages for Jessie.
>
> ok.
>
>> I
>> thought it was more appropriate to post here first, but please let me
>> know if you prefer an official RFS bug.
>
>> Would ctaylor, bilalakhtar, Cyril Lavier, or someone else please
>> sponsor this upload?
>
> I'll happilly do so, but I'd really prefer to do so over git, so please
> do your backporting on the git repositories of those 2 things, either in
> a jessie-backports branch, or just with a tag (I mean, I don't really
> see the point in such jessie-backports branches, I prefer to do my
> backports just with tags without them being on any branch, but this can
> be a bit hard to grasp if you are not used to use git, so do it as you
> prefer).
>
> Please poke me (as in: put my email in the To/Cc, so it gets in folder
> where i actually pay real attention to mails) once you are done, and
> I'll look at what you did and build/sign/upload :)

I've just pushed the trivial changelog changes for audacious and
audacious-plugins.  I've tested that they work, and uploaded the
packages to mentors as proof.

I made my changes, git add, git commit, git tag.  I wasn't sure which
convention to use for backports, so I based my tag on the debian
version.  It's at the top of the list for git tag -l.  I also wasn't
sure if I should if I should reset the tag back to the debian/3.7.2-1
and debian/3.7.2-2.  Please indicate how I can do a better job next
time.

Thank you,
Nicholas