concerning llibva backport

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 05/08/16 21:03, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> I did a fresh build of libva-1.7.1-1~bpo+1 today, and noticed that it
> was building against mesa-10.3.2-1+deb8u1 from Jessie.  I've been
> testing it on a Jessie+backported mesa-11.1.3-1~bpo8+1, and the
> packages I've been testing have also been built against mesa-10.3.x.
> Do you think it's ok to build against mesa 10.3.2, or should we bump
> the build deps of libva to pull in mesa from jessie-backports.  I'm in
> favour of bumping the deps asap.  Additionally, I think it would also
> be wise to bump the intel-vaapi-driver build-depend on libdrm-dev to
> prevent it from being built against libdrm-2.4.58-2.

Why? You realize that building against a newer version of mesa/libdrm
won't affect the dependencies on the final package?

James

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20160805/b659c2c4/attachment.sig>