What went wrong with sonic-pi on mipsel?

Aurelien Jarno aurelien at aurel32.net
Sun Feb 28 15:35:00 UTC 2016


On 2016-02-27 22:27, James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 22:48 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > We are trying to make sense of the build failure for mipsel reported on
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=sonic-pi >.  A
> > program seem to have been stuck for 150 minutes, and we have no idea
> > what could cause this.  The same process worked on mipsel when building
> > version 2.9.0~repack-6, and that part of the code haven't really
> > changed.
> > 
> > Any idea what went wrong?  Can you try to reschedule, in case the
> > problem was caused by something outside the sonic-pi code?
> 
> I tried building it on etler and it built fine, so a give-back should
> work. I have no idea why ruby was hanging on mipsel-manda-01. 

Indeed a give-back has worked, it was probably a transient issue.

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien at aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20160228/ee55cbcb/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list