Bug#798828: videolan: should this package be removed?
Sebastian Ramacher
sramacher at debian.org
Sun Jan 10 14:54:43 UTC 2016
Control: retitle -1 RM: videolan-doc -- ROM; severely outdated
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
On 2015-09-13 12:48:58, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Package: videolan-doc
> Version: 20070626-1
>
> The VLC documentation moved to a wiki and the documentation in videolan-doc is
> outdated. I don't think keeping this package alive has any benefits to our
> users. So, should it be removed?
Since nobody objected I am reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org. Dear FTP
masters, please remove this package from unstable.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20160110/31e7f403/attachment.sig>
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list