Bug#798828: videolan: should this package be removed?

Sebastian Ramacher sramacher at debian.org
Sun Jan 10 14:54:43 UTC 2016


Control: retitle -1 RM: videolan-doc -- ROM; severely outdated
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org

On 2015-09-13 12:48:58, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Package: videolan-doc
> Version: 20070626-1
> 
> The VLC documentation moved to a wiki and the documentation in videolan-doc is
> outdated. I don't think keeping this package alive has any benefits to our
> users. So, should it be removed?

Since nobody objected I am reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org. Dear FTP
masters, please remove this package from unstable.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20160110/31e7f403/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list