Bug#824211: marked as pending

Jaromír Mikeš mira.mikes at gmail.com
Wed Jun 1 10:06:25 UTC 2016


It was not intended to install plugins to multi-arch dir.
This topic was discused already once without a clear result :(
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2014-January/036278.html

mira

2016-06-01 2:58 GMT+02:00 Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves at gmail.com>:
> On 31 May 2016 at 16:27, Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Will be fixed soon.
>>
>> mira
>>
>> 2016-05-31 20:42 GMT+02:00 Javier Serrano Polo <javier at jasp.net>:
>>> El dt 31 de 05 de 2016 a les 14:09 +0000, Jaromír Mikeš va escriure:
>>>> +  * Fix multi-arch path.
>>>
>>> Will the plug-ins be installed under /usr/lib/*/ladspa? I would be in
>>> favor, but AFAIK this would be the first Debian package to ship LADSPA
>>> plug-ins under a multiarch folder instead of /usr/lib/ladspa.
>
> A few of my hopefully-baseless worries:
>
> Would someone please confirm that this is a mechanism in place to
> insure that any of /usr/lib/*/ladspa and /usr/lib/ladspa will be
> correctly added to $LADSPA_PATH?  Also, will the multiarch approach
> necessitate a LADSPA32_PATH LADSPA64_PATH in the case of a mixed i386
> and amd64 system?  Or is this the beginning of a formal transition
> from /usr/lib/ladspa to /usr/lib/$primary_arch/ladspa?
>
> Sincerely,
> Nicholas



More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list