zynaddsubfx FTBFS on some archs

[James Cowgill]

On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 20:52 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2016-06-15 20:19 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill <jcowgill at debian.org>:
> > On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 20:15 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > > 2016-06-15 15:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler <fsateler at debian.org>:
> > > > On 15 June 2016 at 09:29, Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > while updating zynaddsubfx package FTBFS on some archs :(
> > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=zynaddsubfx&suite=unstable
> > > > > 
> > > > > Does somebody have any idea how to fix it?
> > > > 
> > > > Looks like a faulty libc header to me:
> > > > 
> > > > In file included from /usr/include/features.h:385:0,
> > > >                  from /usr/include/stdio.h:27,
> > > >                  from /usr/include/FL/fl_utf8.h:33,
> > > >                  from /usr/include/FL/Fl.H:30,
> > > >                  from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-arm-linux-gnueabi/src/UI/ADnoteUI.h:5,
> > > >                  from
> > > > /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-arm-linux-gnueabi/src/UI/ADnoteUI.cxx:3:
> > > > /usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabi/gnu/stubs.h:10:29: fatal error:
> > > > gnu/stubs-hard.h: No such file or directory
> > > > 
> > > > You could try asking the libc maintainers or the porters for any of those archs.
> > > 
> > > Hi glibc maintainers,
> > > 
> > > I am just updating zynaddsubfx package and it failed to build on some archs.
> > > The problem looks like missing header stubs.h
> > > 
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=zynaddsubfx&suite=unstable
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=zynaddsubfx&arch=armel&ver=2.5.4-1&stamp=1465977781
> > > 
> > > Can there be some problem with libc-dev on these archs?
> > 
> > Like I already said, this happens because you're compiling with
> > '-mfloat-abi=hard' on armel which is not supported on that arch.
> 
> Can you check patch I have just pushed pls?
> Should this fix problem on armel and armhf?

There appears to be a "NoNeonPlease" cmake option which should disable
all these flags. Your patch seems to enable the remaining ARM flags for
all arches since the SUPPORTS_NEON test now always succeeds.

> What about "fat-message" issue?

Upstream fixed just now!
https://github.com/fundamental/rtosc/commit/6c4c89a97968e7329610069ef50ce87ad6234b66

James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20160615/b0a36e07/attachment-0001.sig>