rtaudio package

[Felipe Sateler]

On 21 June 2016 at 10:00, Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-06-20 18:02 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill <jcowgill at debian.org>:
>> On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 17:00 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>> 2016-06-18 12:23 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill <jcowgill at debian.org>:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 22:25 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>> > > can safely upload package now? Soname was bumped.
>>> >
>>> > I can upload this for you if you want, though there are some
>>> > issues.
>>> >
>>> > librtaudio5 is already taken and in use in jessie. To reuse this
>>> > number, the ABI must be identical (which I have not checked). I'm
>>> > still not sure I can believe what I'm reading here:
>>> >
>>> >  librtaudio4    | 4.0.10~ds0-2 | wheezy  | amd64
>>> >  librtaudio4v5  | 4.1.1~ds0-4  | stretch | amd64
>>> >  librtaudio4v5  | 4.1.1~ds0-4  | sid     | amd64
>>> >  librtaudio5    | 4.1.1~ds0-2  | jessie  | amd64
>>
>> I still don't like this. Although it probably won't effect most people,
>> it will break reverse dependencies if you try to do a partial upgrade
>> from jessie to stretch.
>>
>> I think you either need to do a local soname change (not 6!), or rename
>> the package to something like librtaudio5a and have it Conflicts the
>> old package name.
>>
>> That corresponds to the second renaming case on this page (there is no
>> SONAME change when compared to jessie):
>> https://wiki.debian.org/TransitionBestPractices
>
> Ok I renamed package to librtaudio5a and add Conflicts for librtaudio5.
> Now  get package-name-doesnt-match-sonames librtaudio5 ... lintian error.
>
> renaming librtaudio.so.5.0.0 to librtaudio.so.5a.0.0 should be enough?

I suggest overriding this error.

-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler