Bug#817199: transcode: should this package be removed?
Sebastian Ramacher
sramacher at debian.org
Sun Mar 13 20:25:51 UTC 2016
Hi
On 2016-03-09 16:42:20, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 08.03.2016, 23:39 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > What do you think?
>
> No objections, except for this:
>
> $ apt-cache rdepends transcode
> transcode
> Reverse Depends:
> transcode-doc
> xjadeo
> transcode-dbg
> multimedia-video
> python-mecavideo
> dvdwizard
>
> It appears that at least dvdwizard has a hard Depends on transcode.
Yes, dvdwizard would have to be RoQ-ed if we are going to remove transcode. But
it's also dead upstream and orphaned.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20160313/782c84f6/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list