Bug#817199: transcode: should this package be removed?

Sebastian Ramacher sramacher at debian.org
Sun Mar 13 20:25:51 UTC 2016


Hi

On 2016-03-09 16:42:20, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 08.03.2016, 23:39 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > What do you think?
> 
> No objections, except for this:
> 
> $ apt-cache rdepends transcode
> transcode
> Reverse Depends:
>   transcode-doc
>   xjadeo
>   transcode-dbg
>   multimedia-video
>   python-mecavideo
>   dvdwizard
> 
> It appears that at least dvdwizard has a hard Depends on transcode.

Yes, dvdwizard would have to be RoQ-ed if we are going to remove transcode. But
it's also dead upstream and orphaned.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20160313/782c84f6/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list