Debian JUCE packages producing broken build frameworks

[IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)]

On 04/28/2017 05:15 PM, Nicholas Bailey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 21:43:47 BST you wrote:
>> hi,
>>
> Thanks for the personal reply!

:-)
actually the reply went to both you and pkg-multimedia (since i assumed
that you don't necessarily read that list).
in any case, it would be nice to keep the mailinglist in the loop
(unless of course their are "reasons" not to).

> new Audio Plug-In. I'd installed the flac development package, and indeed used 
> it before, and it works perfectly, but the Projuicer made a project which 
> tried to
> 
> 	#include <flac/all.h>
> 
> whereas on my Linux box it should have been
> 
> 	#include <FLAC/all.h>

i see.
since Debian's projucer doesn't allow to use the built-in flac library,
it ought to take care about that.

>>
>> like any other Debian bug-report:
>> $ reportbug libjuce-dev
> Yes, I know about reportbug and I'm happy to do that. What I mean is it may be 
> the wrong package (e.g. is libjuce-dev at fault, or is it juce-tools because 
> Projucer is producing incorrect code?). 

ah well, it's easy enough to reassign a bug to a different package.
also, libjuce-dev and juce-tools are both built from the same source
package "juce", which is where any bug will get fixed (so even less to
worry).


> I hate sending in bug reports which 
> just say "it doesn't work" and instead try to send at least some suggestions 

+1 for good bug reports.

> as to why. I'm also a bit nervous of reportbug 

well, we all reported bugs that were none.
also, this is probably not a problem of the tool :-)

fgmards
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 866 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20170428/8eebd2c0/attachment.sig>