Vee One Suite has new package padthv1 - DD upload needed

James Cowgill jcowgill at debian.org
Wed Aug 23 13:37:54 UTC 2017


Hi Jaromír,

On 23/08/17 13:04, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Vee One Suite has new package padthv1
> http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/1846
> https://padthv1.sourceforge.io/
> 
> I need DD to upload it to "NEW" ... can somebody do it for me?

debian/control:
- automake is already pulled in by debhelper (via dh-autoreconf).
- Sorting your build dependencies would be nice.
- The Homepage redirects to https://padthv1.sourceforge.io/ so perhaps
that should be used?
- The word "standalone" is not a noun so it does not make sense to use
it on its own at the end of the short description.
- In the padthv1-lv2 short description, "lv2-plugin" should probably be
"LV2 plugin" or something similar.

debian/copyright:
- Format field should be https now.
- Source field should use https.
- The short name for public domain works is "public-domain".
- You should include the actual public domain waiver statement in your
debian/copyright file (ie add the line "This work is in public domain."
to the public domain section).
- Your "BDS" license looks like the ISC license to me.

lintian:
W: padthv1: appstream-metadata-in-legacy-location
usr/share/appdata/padthv1.appdata.xml

Apparently the path was recently changed (it was the first time I knew
about it).

W: padthv1-common:
package-has-unnecessary-activation-of-ldconfig-trigger

You can probably ignore this one since it's a debhelper bug and running
ldconfig an extra time usually isn't that much of an issue. If you want
you could fix it by using "dh_makeshlibs --no-scripts" since there are
no public libraries in any package built by this source.

Other:
The git repository already contains a bogus "debian/0.8.4-1" tag.

======

On a related note, I see you've patched upstream to move the lv2 plugins
back into /usr/lib/lv2. I do not know much about lv2 plugins, but is it
a good idea to install them to a multiarch path at some point? How much
work would that be to do for every lv2 plugin in the archive? Would
doing that cause any big issues?

Thanks,
James

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20170823/06157971/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list