Vee One Suite has new package padthv1 - DD upload needed

[Jaromír Mikeš]

2017-08-23 18:10 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill <jcowgill at debian.org>:

> Hi,
>
> On 23/08/17 15:23, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > 2017-08-23 15:37 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill <jcowgill at debian.org>:
> >> On 23/08/17 13:04, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> >>> Vee One Suite has new package padthv1
> >>> http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/1846
> >>> https://padthv1.sourceforge.io/
> >>>
> >>> I need DD to upload it to "NEW" ... can somebody do it for me?
> [...]
> >> - The short name for public domain works is "public-domain".
>

Fixed!


>
> I think DEP5 is case-sensitive, so the P has to be lower case:
> https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-
> format/1.0/#license-short-name
>
> > Thank you for reviewing.
> > All above done!
>
> Thanks. One thing I just noticed is that only one dbgsym package is
> built but there are 3 binary packages. This means the upstream build
> system is stripping the binaries somewhere. I had a play and I think
> adding "QMAKE_STRIP =" to the 3 .pri.in files in src/ will fix it.
>

I am just going to look at it.


>
> >> On a related note, I see you've patched upstream to move the lv2 plugins
> >> back into /usr/lib/lv2. I do not know much about lv2 plugins, but is it
> >> a good idea to install them to a multiarch path at some point? How much
> >> work would that be to do for every lv2 plugin in the archive? Would
> >> doing that cause any big issues?
> >>
> >
> > This is interesting topic which I already started here on list quite long
> > time ago.
> > I would need to search archive to find this tread.
> > Generally problem is ( as I understand it ) that plugins hosts doesn't
> > search for plugins in multiarch path :(
> > Otherwise it would great to have them multiarch.
>
> I think if this were done, the plugin hosts should search both
> directories as a transitional measure (so we could then gradually move
> the plugins over).
>
> I have just found this:
> http://lv2plug.in/pages/filesystem-hierarchy-standard.html
>
> It says that the system path is "$PREFIX/lib/lv2" (as opposed to
> "$LIBDIR/lv2" which would imply multiarch) so maybe this is the wrong
> idea, or at least we should talk to upstream LV2 if we do this.
>

Yes, it should be investigated before starting.
I have found this old thread ... you might be interested:

http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2014-January/036278.html

there has been some ideas which didn't materialize.

best regards

mira
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20170823/6f6ffcf1/attachment.html>