Bug#858173: audacity: please upgrade audacity to 2.2.0

[Antonio Ospite]

Package: audacity
Version: 2.1.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #858173

Dear Maintainer,

just a heads up, version 2.2.0 of Audacity has been released:
http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Release_Notes_2.2.0

Thanks,
   Antonio

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages audacity depends on:
ii  audacity-data       2.1.2-2
ii  libasound2          1.1.3-5
ii  libavcodec57        7:3.3.4-2+b3
ii  libavformat57       7:3.3.4-2+b3
ii  libavutil55         7:3.3.4-2+b3
ii  libc6               2.24-17
ii  libexpat1           2.2.3-2
ii  libflac++6v5        1.3.2-1
ii  libflac8            1.3.2-1
ii  libgcc1             1:7.2.0-12
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0  2.36.11-1
ii  libglib2.0-0        2.54.2-1
ii  libgtk2.0-0         2.24.31-2
ii  libid3tag0          0.15.1b-12
ii  liblilv-0-0         0.24.2~dfsg0-1
ii  libmad0             0.15.1b-8.1
ii  libmp3lame0         3.100-2
ii  libogg0             1.3.2-1+b1
ii  libportaudio2       19.6.0-1
ii  libportsmf0         0.1~svn20101010-5
ii  libsbsms10          2.0.2-2
ii  libsndfile1         1.0.28-4
ii  libsoundtouch1      1.9.2-2+b1
ii  libsoxr0            0.1.2-3
ii  libstdc++6          7.2.0-12
ii  libsuil-0-0         0.10.0~dfsg0-1
ii  libtwolame0         0.3.13-3
ii  libvamp-hostsdk3v5  2.7.1~repack0-1
ii  libvorbis0a         1.3.5-4
ii  libvorbisenc2       1.3.5-4
ii  libvorbisfile3      1.3.5-4
ii  libwxbase3.0-0v5    3.0.3.1+dfsg2-1
ii  libwxgtk3.0-0v5     3.0.3.1+dfsg2-1

audacity recommends no packages.

Versions of packages audacity suggests:
ii  caps [ladspa-plugin]         0.9.24-4
ii  swh-plugins [ladspa-plugin]  0.4.17-2
ii  tap-plugins [ladspa-plugin]  0.7.3-2

-- no debconf information
-- 
Antonio Ospite
https://ao2.it
https://twitter.com/ao2it

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?