sox package adoption

Jaromír Mikeš mira.mikes at gmail.com
Fri Nov 17 13:13:33 UTC 2017


2017-11-06 10:23 GMT+01:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <
umlaeute at debian.org>:

>
>
> On 2017-11-05 22:28, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > I would appreciate ​if someone would fine time to review sox package now.
> > There are couple of concerns ...
>
> i haven't had time to look at the packaging, but:
>
> > 1) should package ship static lib*.a files?
>
> yes (in the -dev package).
> Debian is not only for end-users, but also for developers who might like
> to statically link.
>

​clear
​


> > 2) Is really needed so many packages?
>
> why not?
> the biggest problem with many binary packages is getting them through NEW.
> after that, i consider it a (great!) service to the user to be able to
> strip down dependencies to a minimum, depending on their needs.
>

​ok

mira​
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20171117/ff5583eb/attachment.html>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list