Re: phasex – request for review

James Cowgill jcowgill at debian.org
Mon Jan 1 20:38:14 UTC 2018


Hi,

On 29/12/17 13:42, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2017-12-29 13:46 GMT+01:00 Gabor Karsay <gabor.karsay at gmx.at>:
> 
> ​Hi Gabor,
> 
> 
>> I fixed the watch file for phasex and I'm asking for a review/upload.
>> Maybe mira? You have listed yourself as uploader.
>>
>> Amongst other thing I also migrated to automatic debug packages following
>> this guide: https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages
> 
> 
> ​Lintian says:
> $ lintian -IE --pedantic --no-tag-display-limit
> ../phasex_0.14.97-3_amd64.changes
> P: phasex source: package-uses-old-debhelper-compat-version 10
> W: phasex source: newer-standards-version 4.1.3 (current is 4.1.2)
> I: phasex source: testsuite-autopkgtest-missing
> P: phasex source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
> I: phasex: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/phasex GNU Public License GNU
> General Public License
> I: phasex: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 10320kB 95%
> W: phasex: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/phasex
> W: phasex: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/phasex-convert-patch
> I: phasex: desktop-entry-lacks-keywords-entry
> usr/share/applications/phasex.desktop
>> ​So I would go with dh compat 11 now and keep standards version 4.1.2 until
> lintian will recognize 4.1.3

Lintian is clearly wrong here so I think you should ignore it.

> Also I would fix desktop file ... we are shipping our one in debian dir.
> 
> d/rules
> override_dh_strip:
> dh_strip --dbgsym-migration='phasex-dbg (<< 0.14.97-3~)'
> 
> This seems to be redundant I believe with compat 10 and higher.

Whether the --dbgsym-migration option is redundant depends on the
package. The purpose of that option is to prevent dpkg failing to
install the new dbgsym package if the old dbg package is installed (file
conflicts). Usually if all the binaries in your package have changed,
the debug files in /usr/lib/debug/.build-id will also change names and
the option isn't needed.

In this case no new upstream has been imported, so you probably do need
the option (until the next upstream version is imported).

Thanks,
James

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20180101/306a97de/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list