Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

[IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)]

On 01/28/2018 06:17 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
>>> # Incorrect Package Naming
>>> My script requires repo name = source package name at the moment so
>>> these will be omitted. The pd-* repositories are special because they
>>> need to be put in a separate group. Should they intentionally not have
>>> the correct name - ie should "pd-lua" become "pd/lua" or "pd/pd-lua"?
>> Please, let's keep repo name = source package name.  So the package
>> 'pd-lua' should have a repo 'pd-lua', wherever group it is in.
> I think so, but I'll wait to see what umlaeute says because he pretty
> much owns all the pd-* packages.

oh totally: the repository should always match the package name, so that
would be https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/pd-lua

gfsamrd
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 866 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20180128/69400939/attachment-0001.sig>