Bug#924898: lame 3.100-2+b1 missing dependency on libncurses

[Fabian Greffrath]

Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo

Am Sonntag, den 17.03.2019, 21:58 -0500 schrieb J.D.:
> Package: lame
>   $ lame --version
>   lame: error while loading shared libraries: libncurses.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Well, that's strange, because the lame binary in Debian isn't even linked against libncurses:

$ ldd /usr/bin/lame
	linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffcc57fb000)
	libmp3lame.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmp3lame.so.0 (0x00007fb3ccc68000)
	libtinfo.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.6 (0x00007fb3ccc3a000)
	libsndfile.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsndfile.so.1 (0x00007fb3ccbbe000)
	libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007fb3cca3b000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007fb3cc87a000)
	libFLAC.so.8 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libFLAC.so.8 (0x00007fb3cc602000)
	libogg.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libogg.so.0 (0x00007fb3cc3f7000)
	libvorbis.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libvorbis.so.0 (0x00007fb3cc3c9000)
	libvorbisenc.so.2 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libvorbisenc.so.2 (0x00007fb3cc31e000)
	/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fb3cd122000)

Do you happen to have another lame binary installed in a different directory?

What does 'which lame' tell?

 - Fabian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20190318/29c4ed31/attachment.sig>