Bug#992459: Do we really need a separate dino-im-common package?
Pirate Praveen
praveen at onenetbeyond.org
Wed Aug 18 21:56:35 BST 2021
Package: dino
severity: wishlist
For example nheko (or most gnome apps) just ships the arch independent
files also in nheko (or in their main package - for example
gnome-calendar) binary package. I'm not really sure if splitting a
separate package just for translations and icons is really a good idea
(it does save some disk space, yes). Is there some document that
recommends this kind of splitting?
The downside I see is users installing from backports will have to now
install two binary packages or toggle priority of all packages in
backports. I think we will be mostly likely pushing new upstream
versions via bullseye-backports.
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list