Hi Romain,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/11/10 Romain Beauxis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:toots@rastageeks.org">toots@rastageeks.org</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
The package got rejected because of missing copyright notices (not license)<br>
which the FTP masters consider as mandatory.<br></blockquote><div><br>It's the same for Ubuntu, also.<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
The copyright files needs to be completed, after that the package can enter to<br>
debian. If you want to update it first to ubuntu and synchronise after when the<br>
package is in debian, that should be fine too.<br></blockquote><div><br>As we are at the very beginning of a development cycle in Ubuntu, I prefer to help having this package into Debian, so that more people can benefit of it.<br>
<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
If you fix the copyright file, please send me the fixed version.<br></blockquote><div><br>This is the copyright file that I've generated using licensecheck (a tool that read the copyright headers of the files, and avoid having to open all files one by one). I only have a doubt on lib/base64.c as it seems to be a mess.<br>
<br>Is there some way to have some DD to review this copyright file without uploading the package to mentors? I also can try to have some archive admin in Ubuntu to review it.<br><br>Cheers,<br>Fabrice<br></div></div>