<br>>> I don't want to downgrade to jackd2.<br>><br>> This doesn't make sense. I assume that you meant jackd1 here.<br>><br><br>Yes, that's what I meant.<br><br>> Yes, that's why we want to ship it as default jackd flavor in squeeze.<br>
> However, we discovered that squeeze is better off with both jackd1 and<br>> jackd2 versions, and have applications compiled against libjack0 from<br>> the jackd1 package.<br>><div><br></div><div>Can't you run apps compiled against libjack0 with libjack-jackd2-0? That probaby works, since the interface is the same. Or am I completely off the mark here?</div>
<div><br>> Those packages need to be rebuilt against the updated jackd1 package.<br>> The release team is already on it with scheduling binNMUs. I'm therefore<br>> reassigning this issue to <a href="http://release.debian.org">release.debian.org</a> so that we can reuse this<br>
> bug for tracking purposes.<br>><br>> please CC <a href="mailto:pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org">pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org</a> in your followups.<br>><br>> --<br>
> Gruesse/greetings,<br>> Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4<br>><br><br></div><div>Thanks for letting me know, and thank you for your work in Debian.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Pedro</div>