<p>Thanks to Jonas for pointing out that I was not including the proper mailing list. </p>
<p>Sorry for the inconvenience <br>
---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ----------<br>
Von: "Reinhard Tartler" <<a href="mailto:siretart@gmail.com">siretart@gmail.com</a>><br>
Datum: 11.08.2012 20:10<br>
Betreff: Re: [SCM] libav/master: Also make libav-regular-dbg 'arch: all' for consistency with the other debug packages.<br>
An: "Fabian Greffrath" <<a href="mailto:fabian@greffrath.com">fabian@greffrath.com</a>><br>
Cc: <<a href="mailto:pkg-multimedia-commits@lists.alioth.debian.org">pkg-multimedia-commits@lists.alioth.debian.org</a>></p>
<p>On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Fabian Greffrath <<a href="mailto:fabian@greffrath.com">fabian@greffrath.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Do we actually need this package? It seems that it was not in squeeze,<br>
>> which makes me wonder if we should not drop it.<br>
><br>
> the same is true for libav-extra-dbg. i dont think they are necessary at<br>
> all but now that they have been introduced into Debian i thought that<br>
> "something" had to be done about them and decided to make them<br>
> transitional.<br>
><br>
> fell free to remove them if you consider appropriate.</p>
<p>I'd like to keep libav-extra-dbg, as it is not transitional in ubuntu.<br>
However, I think I'll just drop libav-extra-dbg.</p>
<p>> greetings from an internet cafe in turkey,</p>
<p>Oh, have a great time there! :-)<br></p>
<p>--<br>
regards,<br>
Reinhard<br>
</p>