nicholas at periapt.co.uk
Tue May 1 19:47:19 UTC 2012
On 01/05/12 20:37, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Nicholas Bamber's message of Tue May 01 12:10:03 -0700 2012:
>> I am glad to see you are working on upgrading 5.1. I am working on
>> 5.5.23. I would not remember how to handle subversion branches so it
>> might still end up in experimental. What do you think?
> I haven't seen a response from the release team on the 5.1 vs 5.5 in
> wheezy issue. I personally think its better to plow forward w/ 5.5 than
> limp along with 5.1, but I'm willing to accept that it may cause extra
> work for others.
> Anyway, in light of that, and the need for an update to 5.1.62 in
> stable-security, lets just keep 5.5 in experimental for now. 5.5.24 should
> be out this month, and I believe has yet another important undisclosed
> security bug, so we'll have to move forward soon anyway.
I'll try a more formal approach to the release team than just CC'ing them.
Also I would appreciate your view on #512964. Once we are past this
upgrade I intend to apply it - unless someone objects. If the consensus
moves against it I would tag it wontfix.
Also I intend to offer an opinion on #590905 that you will certainly
want to comment on.
More information about the pkg-mysql-maint